Musings of a Misanthropist

Just another person narcissistic enough to think her thoughts are worth sharing.

Christmas Sucks December 29, 2008

Filed under: Rants — MissAnthropy @ 11:38 am

I know this post will piss off a lot of people who celebrate and enjoy Christmas, but I don’t give a damn.

Christmas is SUCH an inconvenience. I needed to go to the bank: CLOSED. I needed to go to the pharmacy: CLOSED. LMC and I were hungry and out of food at home, but guess what, restaurants and grocery stores: CLOSED. I was suffering from a migraine all Christmas day but, short of the emergency room, I had nowhere to go to get medicine so I was forced to suffer.

I don’t see why I am forced to suffer all the inconveniences of a day without banks, mail, grocery stores, or restaurants when I don’t celebrate the holiday. And before you give me all this crap about the many Americans who DO celebrate it and want to be home with their families… why do we not offer the same privileges/inconveniences to people celebrating Hanukkah, Kwanza, Bodhi, Eid al-Adha, or Yule? If I am to be inconvenienced for a holiday I don’t celebrate, at least lets be fair and inconvenience everyone equally. Again, before you start on the “well, the MAJORITY of people celebrate Christmas” argument, stop and think for a minute. Since Christmas is the only religious holiday that every-freaking-thing shuts down for (including government agencies), which seems pretty damn close to endorsing a national religion.

It seems to me that we should either observe them ALL or NONE.  I’m sure you can tell what my choice would be.

 

Merry Fucking Christmas December 24, 2008

Filed under: Uncategorized — MissAnthropy @ 12:00 pm

Because I live to spread holiday cheer.

picture-21

So have a Merry Christmahanakwanza Whatever The Fuck You Do or Don’t Celebrate

chris_19b

… and a Happy Somewhat Decent New Year

picture-3

 

Like a bad penny, she keeps turning up. December 23, 2008

Filed under: Politics, The Wicked Witch of the North, wingnuts — MissAnthropy @ 11:22 am

In an interview with the wingnut freakshow Human Events, Sarah Palin said her biggest mistake during the campaign was not conducting enough media interviews. Because, obviously, those interviews that she did participate in were such raging successes that she needed more. Duh! How could we not see that?

“The biggest mistake made was that I could have called more shots on this: the opportunities that were not seized to speak to more Americans via media,” she told Human Events.  With such stellar rhetoric the only thing that could have saved her campaign was letting the American people hear more from her, of course.

She elaborated, “I was not allowed to do very many interviews, and the interviews that I did were not necessarily those I would have chosen. But I was so thankful to have the opportunity to run with John McCain that I was not going to argue with the strategy decisions that some of his people were making regarding the media contacts. But if I would have been in charge, I would have wanted to speak to more reporters because that’s how you get your message out to the electorate.”

Translation: I would have done more interviews on Fox with conservative reporters who were sympathetic to my campaign so as not to look like an idiot. That way I would be gauranteed not to receive hard questions like “what newspapers do you read?” Seriously, that was hard. How am I supposed to tell America that I can’t read?

She goes on to criticize McCain staffers (probably the same ones who are blaming her for the monumental failure of the campaign) for mishandling the campaign.

“I was in a campaign in which I did not know the people individually running the campaign. So I had to put my life, my career, my family, and my reputation in their hands. That’s kind of a scary thing to do when you don’t know the people you are working with. Now I have all the faith in the world in Sen. McCain and his family. But some of the folks around him I did not know, and so it was a kind of a risky thing for me to put my faith in the decisions they were making on my behalf.” “… they’re folks who have done this before. Of course, I haven’t done this on a national level before.”

But, of course, God makes everything better.  (You know she can’t give an interview without invoking god.)

“But my reliance on seeking God’s direction in all that I do — that is good enough for me. And others who have a different worldview and different strategy on messaging and such, I would like to have the opportunity to prove to them that my gut instincts were going to be quite adequate.”

Palin also gushes that her hero and role model is Susan B. Anthony because “she was a pro-life feminist.” Which tells me that she really doesn’t know that much about Anthony. Sure, all the pro-life groups tout Anthony as one of their early leaders, but the truth is, while Anthony may have been against abortion (although this is not certain as many historians say the letter expressing these views was wrongly attributed to her), she was also against bearing boat loads of children (Hello Sarah!).

Case in point:

In her personal life Anthony was clear in her conviction that women were not preordained to motherhood, that sometimes a woman and her womb might go their separate ways. A devoted aunt, she claimed to appreciate her colleagues’ offspring, some of whom even felt warmly toward her. But she had little patience for maternity. At best she was the ever-helpful friend who asks if you realize what you are in for just as you have vomited your way through your first trimester. At worst she was a ruthless scold.

Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s pregnancies were Anthony’s despair: how was it possible, she wailed, “that for a moment’s pleasure to herself or her husband, she should thus increase the load of cares under which she already groans”? She was equally indulgent toward Antoinette Brown Blackwell, one of the movement’s most gifted orators: “Now, Nette, not another baby, is my peremptory command.” Over and over she needled Stanton, galled that the suffragette dream team had “all given yourselves over to baby making and left poor brainless me to do battle alone.”

That doesn’t sounds like she and Palin would be good friends to me. And really, how can you claim, in all seriousness, to idolize a woman who stood for progressive ideals and worked her whole life for women’s rights when you, yourself, don’t really support alot of women’s rights issues today?

So, Sarah, honey, keep on giving those rousing and successful interviews. Keep spouting incoherent gibberish. Keep using that eloquently stylistic syntax. Keep it up sweetie, it only provides fodder for my blog.

 

An Obesity Tax? December 18, 2008

Filed under: Economics, Hmm..., My body is not public policy!, Politics, Rants — MissAnthropy @ 4:08 pm

So, the news outlets are abuzz after New York Governor David Patterson proposed an “obesity” tax on sugary soft-drinks as part of his package designed to narrow the budget gap in New York. And while I can’t really say I am outraged by the tax… after all, we tax other unhealthy things, like cigarettes… I am a bit perturbed by the name. Granted, I don’t think Patterson specifically dubbed it “The Obesity Tax” (the media came up with that label), but he specifically links the tax to fighting what he deems to be a “public health epidemic.” (See his editorial on CNN.com.)

Now, the problem I have with this label stems from its targeting obese people specifically. By labeling it an “obesity tax” (versus, say, a “bad habit”) they are turning the tax into a punishment for and an attack on fat people, when, in reality, sugary drinks are consumed by a wide contingency of people. And a big problem with this is, first, they’re automatically equating “fat” with “unhealthy,” which is not always the case and is a huge issue within the Fat-Acceptance blogosphere. There are plenty of perfectly healthy fat people, just like there are plenty of very unhealthy skinny people, and to equate the two is a gross exaggeration and a fallacy that the media often makes, which desperately needs to be debunked. Second, by implying that lessening the consumption of sugary soda will have an effect on an obesity “epidemic” is perpetuating the myth that being fat automatically means a conscious decision to engage in unhealthy or self-destructive behavior rather than, say, a person suffering from thyroid issues, diabetes, depression, etc. Being fat is not necessarily a conscious decision, and is often the result of another ailment. Encouraging fat people to seek help for these other problems would be a better way to deal with obesity than taxing a soft drink.

And, that’s not to mention the people out there who will be outraged by the tax and feel they are being punished because “those stupid fat people can’t control themselves,” which is just inviting more trouble to an already toubled constiuency.

 

File under “S” for Sexism December 18, 2008

Filed under: My job sucks, Métier — MissAnthropy @ 1:22 pm

So, its no secret that our agency is a ‘boys club.’  All the men here are “real men” who like to hunt and fish, and who decorate their offices with animal carcasses. Ever year they hold Deer Camp and invite our clients from the outdoor recreation industries to come slaughter Bambi’s mom.  So, it is no surprise that sexism is prevalent within the agency.

However, today’s blatant example just kind of irked me. We had clients come today for a presentation and they, I guess, wanted to make a good impression. So, they decorated the office for Christmas and in the lobby they constructed a “coffee bar” and had two of our prettiest young ladies dress up, don Santa hats and aprons, and serve coffee and cookies to the clients. And of course, the girls were in charge of decorating because it needed “a woman’s touch.” Then, after the meeting, of course, while the men went to lunch, they made the girls stay and clean up the mess.

And, enevitably, a comment was made by one of the guys in the office that the girls should have been topless.

Might as well send this as our holiday card.

santababymatted

 

Bah, Humbug! December 17, 2008

Filed under: Rants — MissAnthropy @ 4:02 pm

cat-in-santa-hatI hate this time of year because of the social events.  Tonight is the office Christmas party which I am being pressured to attend. But, I don’t like wine or beer, which happen to be the only forms of alcohol they’re serving, and I don’t like half the people going, which means fun will be limited. I don’t like social gatherings, small talk, or crowds. I don’t like having to buy or prepare something for people who won’t appreciate it. And I don’t like having to pretend to enjoy myself when I would rather be somewhere else.

So tell me, since I’m obviously the scrooge of the company… why would they even want me there? They wouldn’t, right? See… I’m not going.

Also on the slate…. somehow get out of attending the Christmas Lunch on Friday and find an excuse to be absent from the family Christmas Eve gathering.

Christmas brings out my inner curmugeon in the way it brings out others’ inner child.

 

Thirst for Knowledge December 16, 2008

Filed under: Musings — MissAnthropy @ 11:07 am

knowledgeI want a “do-over” button for life. 

I’ve really been thinking lately that I wish I had done something different in college. I majored in Psychology and Sociology-Criminology with an Honors minor, and while I really loved it (and still do), I wish I had pursued different interests. 

Well, maybe ‘different interests’ is a bit much… I wish I was able to explore more interests. I really want to go back and complete a major in English and Literature, and also one in Political Science. And I want to take more Anthropology classes. But I want to be able to continue my research in Psychology. I worked for 3 years as a research assistant in an Industrial-Organizational Psychology lab and I loved it because there was so much to explore. 

Its just frustrating because I think our education is so limited in college and you’re under so much pressure all the time to hurry up! graduate and get a job. They really push the “out in 4″ theme where I went… and of course, there’s no financial aid for a 2nd Bachelor’s degree (or a 3rd, or 4th). I just wish I was better able to explore and develop my knowledge. I want to be a life-long student! 

And, while I basically am a life-long student while on the Masters/Ph.D. track… grad work is so specialized that I don’t have any opportunity to explore other interests. Of course, I realize that I am free to explore them on my own, and I devour books like they’re in danger of disappearing, but without the university environment I find it hard to access a continuing dialog on the subjects I’m exploring. 

I think that’s why I want to work in a university library (I’m pursuing a master’s in Library and Information Studies, and then hopefully a Ph.D. in Information Science) … knowledge is just so important to me and I want to help foster and preserve it. 

I just wish I were able to pursue more. I need multiple lives. 

*Sigh*

 

McCain-Palin: F*ck-ups till the end. December 15, 2008

Filed under: Politics, Rants, The Wicked Witch of the North, wingnuts — MissAnthropy @ 4:01 pm

The monumentally fail-tastic republican campaign has screwed up again. The McCain-Palin firesale offered office supplies and electronics for rock-bottom prices, presumably to recoup some of their losses during the election. But, they screwed up.

For a mere $20 you can get a Blackberry cell phone loaded with enough GOP contacts to assemble your own band of wingnuts to loose a presidential bid, plus, an added bonus of McCain-Palin campaign emails so you can follow in the footsteps of mediocrity.

A Fox TV station was lucky enough to purchase one of these loaded cell phones.  They wrote:

When we charged them up in the newsroom, we found one of the $20 Blackberry phones contained more than 50 phone numbers for people connected with the McCain-Palin campaign, as well as hundreds of emails from early September until a few days after election night.

We traced the Blackberry back to a staffer who worked for “Citizens for McCain,” a group of democrats who threw their support behind the Republican nominee.  The emails contain an insider’s look at how grassroots operations work, full of scheduling questions and rallying cries for support.

But most of the numbers were private cell phones for campaign leaders, politicians, lobbyists and journalists.

We called some of the numbers.

“Somebody made a mistake,” one owner told us.  “People’s numbers and addresses were supposed to be erased.”

“They should have wiped that stuff out,” another said.  But he added, “Given the way the campaign was run, this is not a surprise.”

We called the McCain-Palin campaign, who says, “it was an unfortunate staff error and procedures are being put in place to ensure all information is secure.”

What a bargain.

________________________________________________________________

 

And of course, if you missed it, here’s the tantalizing little tidbit from John McCain regarding Palin’s possible bid for the 2012 presidency:

Sen. John McCain said Sunday he would not necessarily support his former running mate if she chose to run for president.

 Speaking to ABC’s “This Week,” McCain was asked whether Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin could count on his support.

 ”I can’t say something like that. We’ve got some great other young governors. I think you’re going to see the governors assume a greater leadership role in our Republican Party,” he said.

 He then mentioned governors Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota and Jon Huntsman of Utah.

 McCain said he has “the greatest appreciation for Gov. Palin and her family, and it was a great joy to know them.”

 ”She invigorated our campaign” against Barack Obama for the presidency, he said.

 McCain was pressed on why he can’t promise support for the woman who, just months ago, he named as the second best person to lead the nation. 

“Have no doubt of my admiration and respect for her and my view of her viability, but at this stage, again … my corpse is still warm, you know?” he replied.

See. I knew he never really liked her.  I guarantee he doesn’t really believe she is capable of running a country, let alone her little state. He has basically admitted the Palin choice was a political move to gain votes from Hilary supporters. The fact that he ever thought women would vote for her just because she was a fellow woman shows he just groups women together as a dumb constituency. He doesn’t strike me as a man with a favorable view of women and now that she’s no longer his political tool, Palin is just another dumb broad to him. And while that opinion may be true of Palin, it is certainly not one that can be applied to women in general… and yet, he probably views us all as Barbie dolls; women are there to look pretty, provide support to their man, and serve as a tool now and then, whether in a campaign or in the sack. 

I say good riddance to both of them. 

 

 

Obama is gay friendly December 14, 2008

Filed under: Randomness — MissAnthropy @ 8:47 pm

This makes me happy.

For the first time in American history, a gay and lesbian band will be marching in a presidential inauguration.

Barack Obama’s Presidential Inaugural Committee has chosen the Lesbian and Gay Band Association, with members from across the country, to march in the inaugural parade in Washington on Jan. 20.  Twenty-six Bay Area musicians from the San Francisco Lesbian Gay Freedom Band and Cheer San Francisco will participate as members of the Lesbian and Gay Band Association, a national group tapped to march in the inaugural event.  “It means the Obama transition team views lesbian and gay men as part of America,” said Rice Majors, artistic director for the Lesbian and Gay Band Association. “We’re a visible part of America.”

The Washington Blade, a gay newspaper that was the first to report the news, said that Bill Clinton allowed gay groups to perform their music on the sidewalk during his inauguration but not to march in the parade.

 

Feminists are destroying Isreal December 12, 2008

Filed under: Hmm..., Randomness — MissAnthropy @ 11:15 am

Via Feministe.

Yaakov Schlusser, chairman of Isreal’s Men’s Rights Party, explains that “the feminists are destroying the country.”

“Seeing as we live in an extremist feminist state, the entire system is unjust, including the courts, welfare services, the police, and the government,” he told Ynet. “The feminists are destroying every good part of this country. A country that doesn’t respect its men has no right to exist.”

Schlusser is especially grieved by the courts’ child custody policies, and claims that one out of every two fathers loses the right to see their children as a result of messy divorces. He says this policy does inestimable harm to the children, especially the males among them.

“Children have a right to see their fathers. Otherwise they will lose their sexual identity. The child that sees a woman in control, in contradiction to nature, may turn homosexual,” he claims.

But Schlusser has a plan to counter the damaging effects of feminist court policies. “The first thing I’ll do if I get into the Knesset is pass a bill for children to be transferred to the father’s custody primarily, and only afterwards every case will be examined,” he said.

When asked regarding his thoughts on equality between the genders he said, “In the past I was pro-equality, but I’ve seen that women don’t know how to accept equality. If you’re good they try to take over. I know this from the 20 years we’ve existed.”

[...]

Despite his views, he claims he is not a chauvinist. “The claims that I am a chauvinist are demagoguery. I love women and support relationships, my mother was a woman and I have a daughter,” he said. “I’m not against women but nature has rules: The man should be on top, there should not be equality.”

Way to score points with the ladies. And, you’re mother was a woman? Who would’ve thought.